Avoid using the character literal syntax

This page is not yet available in Spanish. We are working on its translation.
If you have any questions or feedback about our current translation project, feel free to reach out to us!

Metadata

ID: ruby-best-practices/no-character-literals

Language: Ruby

Severity: Notice

Category: Best Practices

Description

In Ruby, character literals are represented by ? followed by a single character. For instance, ?a represents the character a. While this is a valid Ruby syntax, it’s less commonly used and can be confusing for some developers, especially those coming from different programming languages.

The use of character literal syntax can lead to less readable and maintainable code. As a rule of thumb, it’s best to prioritize code clarity and readability over the use of lesser-known syntax features. This promotes better understanding of the code, reduces the likelihood of bugs, and facilitates collaboration among team members.

To avoid using character literal syntax, use a string with a single character. For example, instead of ?a use "a". This approach is more straightforward and is widely accepted in the Ruby community. It’s also more consistent with other languages, making your code more intuitive for developers with diverse backgrounds.

Non-Compliant Code Examples

char1 = ?a
char2 = ?z
char3 = ?M
char4 = ?>
char5 = ?_
char6 = ?\\

Compliant Code Examples

char1 = "a"
char2 = "z"
char3 = "M"
char4 = ">"
char5 = "_"
char6 = "\\"
https://static.datadoghq.com/static/images/logos/github_avatar.svg https://static.datadoghq.com/static/images/logos/vscode_avatar.svg jetbrains

Seamless integrations. Try Datadog Code Analysis

PREVIEWING: Cyril-Bouchiat/add-vm-package-explorer-doc