Avoid using a public contructor for an abstract class

This page is not yet available in Spanish. We are working on its translation.
If you have any questions or feedback about our current translation project, feel free to reach out to us!

Metadata

ID: csharp-best-practices/public-abstract-constructors

Language: C#

Severity: Notice

Category: Best Practices

Description

Using an abstract modifier in a class declaration indicates that a class is intended only to be a base class of other classes and not instantiated by itself. Due to this, there is no need for public or internal constructors within. Any initialization logic should be added in a private,private protected, or protected constructor.

Non-Compliant Code Examples

abstract class Foo
{
    internal Foo()
    {
      //...
    }
}
abstract class Foo
{
    public Foo()
    {
      //...
    }
}

Compliant Code Examples

abstract class Foo
{
    private protected Foo()
    {
      //...
    }
}
abstract class Foo
{
    private Foo()
    {
      //...
    }
}
abstract class Foo
{
    protected Foo()
    {
      //...
    }
}
https://static.datadoghq.com/static/images/logos/github_avatar.svg https://static.datadoghq.com/static/images/logos/vscode_avatar.svg jetbrains

Seamless integrations. Try Datadog Code Analysis

PREVIEWING: antoine.dussault/service-representation-ga-docs-us1