Prefer using iterators over for loops

Cette page n'est pas encore disponible en français, sa traduction est en cours.
Si vous avez des questions ou des retours sur notre projet de traduction actuel, n'hésitez pas à nous contacter.

Metadata

ID: ruby-best-practices/no-for-loops

Language: Ruby

Severity: Warning

Category: Best Practices

Description

In Ruby, it is generally preferred to use iterators, such as each, map, select, and others, over traditional for loops. This rule is important because iterators are more idiomatic in Ruby and often lead to more concise and readable code. They allow for better encapsulation and scoping, reducing the risk of variable leakage and unexpected side effects.

for loops, on the other hand, don’t have their own scope for local variables, which can lead to bugs and make the code harder to understand. Therefore, using iterators can make your code safer and easier to maintain.

To comply with this rule, you should replace for loops with equivalent iterator methods whenever possible. For example, instead of using for elem in arr do, you can use arr.each do |elem|. This way, you can maintain the same functionality while adhering to Ruby’s best practices and enhancing your code’s readability and maintainability.

Non-Compliant Code Examples

class NonCompliant
  def method()
    arr = ['foo', 'bar', 'baz']
    for elem in arr do
      puts elem
    end
  end
end

Compliant Code Examples

arr.each do |elem|
  puts elem
end

class Compliant
  def method()
    arr = ['foo', 'bar', 'baz']

    arr.each do
      puts elem
    end

    arr.each { |elem| puts elem }
  end
end
https://static.datadoghq.com/static/images/logos/github_avatar.svg https://static.datadoghq.com/static/images/logos/vscode_avatar.svg jetbrains

Seamless integrations. Try Datadog Code Analysis

PREVIEWING: rtrieu/product-analytics-ui-changes