In Go, the expression s[n:len(s)] is used to slice a string or slice s starting from index n up to the end of s. However, it is considered suboptimal and can be replaced with the simpler and more expressive s[n:] notation.
Using s[n:len(s)] is not optimal for a few reasons:
Readability: The s[n:] notation provides a clearer and more concise representation of slicing from index n to the end of s. It eliminates the need to explicitly specify len(s), making the code more readable.
Simplicity: By using s[n:], you remove unnecessary redundancy in the code. It improves the simplicity of your code and reduces the chances of introducing errors when manually specifying the length of s.
Performance: Although the performance difference may be negligible, using s[n:] is more efficient than creating a len(s) expression. The s[n:] notation directly references the underlying slice without requiring an additional length calculation.
For example, let’s consider the following code snippets:
s:="Hello, World!"fmt.Println(s[7:len(s)])
Output: “World!”
s:="Hello, World!"fmt.Println(s[7:])
Output: “World!”
Both snippets will produce the same output, but the second one using s[7:] is preferred for its simplicity and readability.
By replacing s[n:len(s)] with s[n:], you can improve the clarity and maintainability of your code while still achieving the desired slicing functionality.
Non-Compliant Code Examples
funcmain(){d:=s[n:len(s)]}
Compliant Code Examples
funcmain(){d:=s[n:]}
Seamless integrations. Try Datadog Code Analysis
Datadog Code Analysis
Try this rule and analyze your code with Datadog Code Analysis
How to use this rule
1
2
rulesets:- go-best-practices # Rules to enforce Go best practices.
Create a static-analysis.datadog.yml with the content above at the root of your repository
Use our free IDE Plugins or add Code Analysis scans to your CI pipelines